工業和商業黃頁資訊網論文書籍站
Netflix takedown的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列問答集和資訊懶人包
Netflix takedown的問題，我們搜遍了碩博士論文和台灣出版的書籍，推薦Shannon, Elaine寫的 Hunting LeRoux: The Inside Story of the Dea Takedown of a Criminal Genius and His Empire 和Shannon, Elaine/ Boutsikaris, Dennis (NRT)/ Mann, Michael (FRW)的 Hunting Leroux: The Inside Story of the DEA Takedown of a Criminal Genius and His Empire都 可以從中找到所需的評價。
這兩本書分別來自 和所出版 。
東吳大學 法律學系 李建良所指導 羅健倫的 被遺忘權發展與實踐 — 兼論言論自由的私人審查制度 （2020），提出Netflix takedown關鍵因素是什麼，來自於被遺忘權、個人資料保護、隱私權、基本權利、言論自由。
而第二篇論文國立政治大學 法律學研究所 馮震宇所指導 張倍齊的 視頻網站及其著作權問題研究 （2011），提出因為有 視頻網站、由使用者產生內容、UGC、Hulu、責任限制、避風港、通知取下、雲端的重點而找出了 Netflix takedown的解答。
Hunting LeRoux: The Inside Story of the Dea Takedown of a Criminal Genius and His Empire
為了解決Netflix takedown 的問題，作者Shannon, Elaine 這樣論述：
With a foreword by four-time Oscar nominated filmmaker Michael Mann.The story of Paul LeRoux, the twisted-genius entrepreneur and cold-blooded killer who brought revolutionary innovation to international crime, and the exclusive inside story of how the DEA's elite, secretive 960 Group brought him do
wn.Paul LeRoux was born in Zimbabwe and raised in South Africa. After a first career as a pioneering cybersecurity entrepreneur, he plunged hellbent into the dark side, using his extraordinary talents to develop a disruptive new business model for transnational organized crime. Along the way he crea
ted a mercenary force of ex-U.S. and NATO sharpshooters to carry out contract murders for his own pleasure and profit. The criminal empire he built was Cartel 4.0, utilizing the gig economy and the tools of the Digital Age: encrypted mobile devices, cloud sharing and novel money-laundering technique
s. LeRoux's businesses, cyber-linked by his own dark worldwide web, stretched from Southeast Asia across the Middle East and Africa to Brazil; they generated hundreds of millions of dollars in sales of arms, drugs, chemicals, bombs, missile technology and murder. He dealt with rogue nations--Iran an
d North Korea--as well as the Chinese Triads, Somali pirates, Serb mafia, outlaw bikers, militants, corrupt African and Asian officials and coup-plotters.Initially, LeRoux appeared as a ghost image on law enforcement and intelligence radar, an inexplicable presence in the middle of a variety of crim
inal endeavors. He was Netflix to Blockbuster, Spotify to Tower Records. A bold disruptor, his methods brought international crime into the age of innovation, making his operations barely detectable and LeRoux nearly invisible. But he gained the attention of a small band of bold, unorthodox DEA agen
ts, whose brief was tracking down drugs-and-arms trafficking kingpins who contributed to war and global instability. The 960 Group, an element of the DEA's Special Operations Division, had launched some of the most complex, coordinated and dangerous operations in the agency's history. They used unor
thodox methods and undercover informants to penetrate LeRoux's inner circle and bring him down. For five years Elaine Shannon immersed herself in LeRoux's shadowy world. She gained exclusive access to the agents and players, including undercover operatives who looked LeRoux in the eye on a daily bas
is. Shannon takes us on a shocking tour of this dark frontier, going deep into the operations and the mind of a singularly visionary and frightening figure--Escobar and Victor Bout along with the innovative vision of Steve Jobs rolled into one. She puts you in the room with these people and their mo
ment-to-moment encounters, jeopardy, frustration, anger and small victories, creating a narrative with a breath-taking edge, immediacy and a stranger-than-fiction reality.Remarkable, disturbing, and utterly engrossing, Hunting LeRouxintroduces a new breed of criminal spawned by the savage, greed-exa
lting underside of the Age of Innovation--and a new kind of true crime story. It is a look into the future--a future that is dark.
被遺忘權發展與實踐 — 兼論言論自由的私人審查制度
為了解決Netflix takedown 的問題，作者羅健倫 這樣論述：
順應網路發達逐漸受到重視的被遺忘權，因歐盟法院Google v. AEPD的判決而廣為人知，並於GDPR 中正式法制化。2018年施行的GDPR係引領全球重要的個資保護規範，不僅透過「適足性認定」影響著日、韓、新加坡等各國的個資法規修訂，我國的個資法也將以該法規作為範本進行修法。然而被遺忘權的發展幾乎跨不出歐盟的疆域，若我國欲引進被遺忘權法制，勢必將參照各國的個資法規現況，了解被遺忘權在歐盟以外難以落實之主因。尤其先進國家相繼成立個資保護委員會/隱私保護局，行政機關在被遺忘權審查上之角色為何亦值得探究。是以，本文就個資保護源自於隱私權之背景為完整的說明與介紹，探詢被遺忘權在基本權利上的定位。
其後說明被遺忘權在歐盟以及各國之法規與案例，探討新興權利在科技發展下可能面臨的困境。接著以我國被遺忘權之案例，可發現最高法院在態度上逐漸轉變，使被遺忘權在我國實踐之可能性提升。隨之而來的，即為在承認我國法制上有被遺忘權之前提下，個資主體將以何種制度遂行其權利方為妥適。首當其衝之問題即屬我國是否承襲歐盟模式，將被遺忘權之審查交由搜尋引擎業者負責？因被遺忘權本身即屬個資保護與言論自由之衝突，私人企業可否審查他人言論顯有疑義。而行政機關介入的力道亦難拿捏，若介入過深恐走回政府審查言論的老路；若介入力道過輕，等同將放任言論市場交給地位與使用者顯不對等的網路巨擘管理。本文最後即提出獨立審查部門之模式，作
為未來修法之參考方向，期許此修法建議能在言論自由與個資保護間尋求微妙的平衡。
Hunting Leroux: The Inside Story of the DEA Takedown of a Criminal Genius and His Empire
為了解決Netflix takedown 的問題，作者Shannon, Elaine/ Boutsikaris, Dennis (NRT)/ Mann, Michael (FRW) 這樣論述：
With an introduction by four-time Oscar nominated filmmaker Michael Mann.The story of Paul LeRoux, the twisted genius entrepreneur and cold-blooded killer who brought revolutionary innovation to international crime, and the exclusive inside story of how the DEA's elite, secretive 960 Group brought h
im down.Paul LeRoux was born in Zimbabwe and raised in South Africa. After a first career as a pioneering cybersecurity entrepreneur, he plunged hellbent into the dark side, using his extraordinary talents to develop a disruptive new business model for transnational organized crime. Along the way he
created a mercenary force of ex-U.S. and NATO sharpshooters to carry out contract murders for his own pleasure and profit. The criminal empire he built was Cartel 4.0, utilizing the gig economy and the tools of the Digital Age: encrypted mobile devices, cloud sharing and novel money-laundering tech
niques. LeRoux's businesses, cyber-linked by his own dark worldwide web, stretched from Southeast Asia across the Middle East and Africa to Brazil; they generated hundreds of millions of dollars in sales of arms, drugs, chemicals, bombs, missile technology and murder. He dealt with rogue nations--Ir
an and North Korea--as well as the Chinese Triads, Somali pirates, Serb mafia, outlaw bikers, militants, corrupt African and Asian officials and coup-plotters.Initially, LeRoux appeared as a ghost image on law enforcement and intelligence radar, an inexplicable presence in the middle of a variety of
criminal endeavors. He was Netflix to Blockbuster, Spotify to Tower Records. A bold disruptor, his methods brought international crime into the age of innovation, making his operations barely detectable and LeRoux nearly invisible. But he gained the attention of a small band of bold, unorthodox DEA
agents, whose brief was tracking down drugs-and-arms trafficking kingpins who contributed to war and global instability. The 960 Group, an element of the DEA's Special Operations Division, had launched some of the most complex, coordinated and dangerous operations in the agency's history. They used
unorthodox methods and undercover informants to penetrate LeRoux's inner circle and bring him down. For five years Elaine Shannon immersed herself in LeRoux's shadowy world. She gained exclusive access to the agents and players, including undercover operatives who looked LeRoux in the eye on a dail
y basis. Shannon takes us on a shocking tour of this dark frontier, going deep into the operations and the mind of a singularly visionary and frightening figure--Escobar and Victor Bout and Jeff Bezos rolled into one. She puts you in the room with these people and their moment-to-moment encounters,
jeopardy, frustration, anger and small victories, creating a narrative with a breath-taking edge, immediacy and a stranger-than-fiction reality.Remarkable, disturbing, and utterly engrossing, Hunting LeRoux introduces a new breed of criminal spawned by the savage, greed-exalting underside of the Age
of Innovation--and a new kind of true crime story. It is a look into the future--a future that is dark.
視頻網站及其著作權問題研究
為了解決Netflix takedown 的問題，作者張倍齊 這樣論述：
現今視頻網站佔電腦使用者使用網路時數極大比例，在世界各地亦有越來越取代電視之勢，然而隨著視頻網站之風行，相關著作權問題亦隨之而生。特別是網路上不少行為常介於合理使用模糊空間，關於法律條文與案例事實之合致，常引發爭論。網路之精神著重分享，然而著作權之保護則屬於國家保護之一種排他權，其與分享之精神，某些時候會有所衝突，如何在網路時代運用著作權保護創作人，卻又不扼殺創意、公益使用，應有探討必要。是以本文將針對視頻網站上開相關問題，作一基本探討，並對外國與臺灣在視頻網站相關立法與案例作整理介紹，特別是美國法立法與相關案例，與我國法制、實務判決比較，並分析檢討後，提出具體看法，或可做為我國未來立法走向
以及實務判決參考。本文架構上，第一章為緒論，內容為研究動機與論文大致架構；第二章則就視頻網站現況與商務模式探討，期能鳥瞰全貌；第三章與第四章分別就視頻網站使用者與業者之責任探討，均以美國法與我國法為主，輔以中國大陸法規做比較與得失分析；第五章則論及新科技演進與著作權法制、法院判決之因應；第六張結論，最末章為參考文獻。