Continental tire的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列問答集和資訊懶人包

Fatigue Crack Growth in Rubber Materials: Experiments and Modelling

為了解決Continental tire的問題，作者 這樣論述：

Gert Heinrich graduated from the University in Jena (Germany) in quantum physics in 1973. At the Technical University (TH) Leuna-Merseburg, he finished his doctorate in 1978 in polymer network physics and his Habilitation in 1986 about theory of polymer networks and topological constraints. In 1990

he received a position at the tire manufacturer Continental in Hanover (Germany) as senior research scientist and head of Materials Research. Heinrich continued his academic activities as lecturer at Universities of Hanover and Halle/Wittenberg. In 2002, he was appointed as full professor for ＂Polym

er Materials and Rubber Technology＂ at the Technical University Dresden and as director of the Institute of Polymer Materials at the Leibniz Institute of Polymer Research Dresden e. V. (IPF). Since 2017 he is Senior Professor. His work has been recognized by several grants and awards, e.g. the Georg

e Stafford Whitby Award for distinguished teaching and research from the Rubber Division of the ACS, the Colwyn Medal in UK for outstanding services to the rubber industry; the Carl Dietrich Harries Medal from the German Rubber Society, and the Lifetime Achievement Award from Tire Technology Interna

tional Magazine. Science ranking (Google Scholar) indicates: h-Index = 64; i10-Index = 321 (10/2019).Reinhold Kipscholl graduated as Dipl.-Ing. in engineering of data processing and electronics. He is active since more than 20 years in leading industrial positions, especially in the field of testing

and characterization of materials with respect of their physical behavior. Since 20 years he is General Manager of Coesfeld GmbH & Co. KG (Dortmund), a German Company developing and producing material testing equipment for plastics and elastomers. Since 2012 R. Kipscholl is founder and General Mana

ger of PRL Polymer Research Lab., a Czech Company researching and developing new testing methods for characterization of fracture and wear behavior of rubbers. He has been awarded with the 2018 Fernley H. Bunbury Award (Rubber Division, American Chemical Society). Scopus indicates 10 publications.Ra

dek Stoček obtained his diploma degree as an engineer in 2005 from the Czech Technical University in Prague and received his Ph.D. in engineering science in 2012 from the Technical University Chemnitz (Germany), working with M. Gehde and parallel with G. Heinrich at IPF Dresden (G). Then he started

an industrial career at Polymer Research Lab (PRL), Zlin, Czech Republic, and parallel an independent academic career at the Tomas Bata University (TBU) in Zlin. He finished his Habilitation in 2019. Currently he is holding the two positions as Head of R&D at PRL and Head of the Rubber Department at

TBU. His research and scientific interests are focused on characterization of rubber material properties with respect to fatigue and fracture mechanics and on the development of new and advanced testing methodologies, hardware and equipments. One main goal is to optimize industrial rubber products

in terms of performance and durability as well as to fasten development cycles and minimizing extensive real rubber product tests before production. His work has been recognized by awards from The Tire Society (USA). R. Stocek is author of 30 publications (according to Scopus) and holds two Utility

Models.

Continental tire進入發燒排行的影片

由美國實務探討專利權耗盡原則與授權契約之限制

為了解決Continental tire的問題，作者劉映辰 這樣論述：

專利權耗盡原則，又稱為第一次銷售原則，其意義上乃專利權人自行製造或經其同意製造之專利物品銷售予第三人後，即喪失其對於該物品之銷售權及使用權，任何合法取得該物品之第三人，皆得以使用及再銷售該物品，為專利權人之排他權所不及。此原則之主要目的，係為了平衡專利權人所擁有之排他權與合法取得專利物之人所擁有之使用權，以維護專利物品於市場上自由流通及避免專利權人雙重獲利。由於美國專利法並沒有明確規範專利權耗盡原則之要件以及適用範圍，故有關耗盡原則之議題，多以美國法院之實務見解作為判斷之標準，故本文首先介紹歷年美國相關案例，藉以分析專利權耗盡原則之發展以及專利授權契約之限制對於耗盡原則之影響。其次，介紹我國

專利法上關於專利耗盡及專利授權之概念及相關規定。進而從我國相關之實務案例，探討耗盡原則之建立及針對授權契約之限制是否得以迴避耗盡原則之適用加以剖析。最後，藉由比較我國法及美國法關於耗盡原則及授權契約限制之實務見解，進一步歸納我國與美國於立法政策上對於耗盡原則的理解及運用之異同。本文認為藉由我國和美國與耗盡原則相關實務案例之比較，可知專利耗盡原則之適用及專利授權契約之限制，其判斷標準受到多重因素之影響，包含各國專利制度之不同、個案事實認定以及實務見解之不同。然而，專利耗盡原則係針對專利權人所能壟斷之範圍做出限制，對於市場競爭有重大之影響，故耗盡原則之適用應回歸專利制度本身之立法目的，即促進專利技

術創新及社會經濟。